Enter your airport code - See Common Codes
(example: BWI for Baltimore Washington Int.)
  
Senior meteorologist with 18 years of experience at AccuWeather.
[ Bio ]  
Headline: Earth™:
Katie Fehlinger hosts Headline: Earth, which takes an unbiased look at all sides of the global warming debate. The weekly show features the latest headlines related to global warming, along with interviews of prominent and newsworthy guests, including global warming legislation advocate and chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee (EPW), Senator (D) Barbara Boxer of California and global warming skeptic and former EPW chairman, Senator (R) James Inhofe of Oklahoma. Visit Headline: Earth's video page to see any or all of Katie's videos. 
Solid Answers may come soon from the Arctic
Tall Building Windows could become Energy Plants June Satellite Temperature Anomalies Forecasting the Future A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words The Lone Exception CDC Testimony was Edited by V.P. Office, says Former EPA Official Global Warming has Ended, according to this Source Time to Compare Ocean Temperature Anomalies Not Just the Sticker Price Anymore 
|
« Stern Remarks on Global Warming | Main | She Blinded Me with Science »
November 1, 2006
More Proof the Apocalypse is NearThe lawyers have gotten involved! Yes, according to this article from the Toronto Daily News, governments and companies may face law suits for their role in global warming. I've already seen global warming skeptics compared with people who claimed cigarettes weren't harmful to health, but this is a new twist. Of course, California has already sued the "big 6" automakers over greenhouse gas emissions.
Share this:
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry: |
© 2007 AccuWeather, Inc.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this blog are those of the
author(s) and not necessarily those of AccuWeather Inc, or AccuWeather.com
Terms of usage under which this service is provided.
Subscribers sign-in to AccuWeather Premium | AccuWeather Professional
Not a Member? Read all about Premium and Professional.
RSS Feeds Available 
Podcasts Available 
Blogs Available
Comments (1)
Isn't it appropriate that polluters be responsible for the clean-up costs of polluting if it had been avoidable? Where I come from, people are respected for taking responsibility for their actions. If cafe standards were not accurately recorded or some pollutant were irresponsibly ignored, then it would absolutely be legal exposure for an auto-maker.
Auto pollution is carcinogenic (forgive the pun). So comparing any irresponsibility, real or imagined, to the tobacco companies is not so strange.
Can you say "Superfund"?
Posted by Daniel Kany | April 29, 2008 9:47 PM