AccuWeather.com
 Your Local Forecast  
Airport Search^
Airport Weather Forecast
X
 

Enter your airport code - See Common Codes
(example: BWI for Baltimore Washington Int.)

Radar Search^
Nexrad Radar Search
X
   

Enter your zip code
(example: 16801 for State College, PA)

Back to global warming center



Senior meteorologist with 18 years of experience at AccuWeather.
[ Bio ]

Headline: Earth
Headline: Earth™:
Katie Fehlinger hosts Headline: Earth, which takes an unbiased look at all sides of the global warming debate. The weekly show features the latest headlines related to global warming, along with interviews of prominent and newsworthy guests, including global warming legislation advocate and chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee (EPW), Senator (D) Barbara Boxer of California and global warming skeptic and former EPW chairman, Senator (R) James Inhofe of Oklahoma. Visit Headline: Earth's video page to see any or all of Katie's videos.


July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
We'd like to hear your questions on global warming! You can send your questions here via email.

« Too Many Beans, Barney? | Main | Times Changing for Skeptics? »

February 15, 2007

Suing for Bears

polar_bear2.jpe

Image U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Two conservation groups, the Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific Environment are suing the federal government for not doing enough to protect polar bears and walruses against the threats of oil and gas exploration and global warming.

The groups say the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service did not fully consider the effects of global warming, such as diminished sea ice, as it wrote regulations allowing for incidental harassment of polar bears and walruses by the industry in the Beaufort Sea and nearby coastal areas.

The lawsuit focuses on the legal "incidental taking" of polar bears and walruses, which is defined not just as killing an animal, but also as "harassment that disturbs and behavior."

Between 1994 and 2000, oil and gas industries reported 258 polar bear sightings and 66 instances of direct harassment of polar bears, an average of fewer than 10 per year. The number of harassment incidents did jump to 36 in 2004, however.

Does the suit bring more attention to the issues of conservation? Yes. But at what cost?

Share this:

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://global-warming.accuweather.com/blog/mt-tb.cgi/197

Comments (8)

Oiznop:

I wonder how long the Polar Bears and Walruses took to type up their complaint? Curses those evil oil and gas explorers anyway! I'll dare they scout for more energy supplies so the United States can find it's own oil supplies and tell the middle east (remember, the region that hates us?) to go pound it! And the absurdity from the environmental lunatic fringe continues.

Barbara Williams:

At what cost, indeed. Who's paying for this bit of frivolity in the courts?

Karl Quick:

We are in the midst of a population explosion worldwide that is more likely to do great harm than (even) global warming. Already, the median age of people in Africa and in the Islamic world is below 25. Virtually all of these youth are uneducated and live in societies where there is little hope. They are bombarded with TV and movies portraying a life that is impossible for them to match (at best) and viewed as evil and disgusting (at worst.) The result will be violence on a massive scale. The crisis we face is not "just" global warming, but global mass murder. If we can't successfully "build democratic nations" around the world, with a focus on education enabling independence, tyrants will emerge who will brutally bring an end to our modern era. Let's work to do more than feed and cure the children of the 3rd world. If we do only that, we are condemning them to an adulthood of frustration and violence that will lead many to view our gift of food and meds as ultimately, inhumane.

Julie:

My guess you and I and all the taxpayers are going to be priveledged to pay for the lawsuit. I wonder what the polar bears and walruses are going to do with all that money if they win? Maybe save it for a snowy day?

Rick Ressler:

Remember the Alaskan pipeline and how its construction would wipe out the caribou? Well, it didn't happen; the caribou are flourishing. This is just more of the same nonsense.

Thor:

well I see we have two speciests. As the only sentient species on the planet, i.e. cognizant of its existence, humans, especially those of tenchnological societies should have some obligation to protect lower lifeforms since they're incapable of defending themselves. It's not frivolity; it's due respect as these like so many other life forms are our kin. When human numbers dwindle to say 60 million i.e. the number of bison in colonial times, then maybe the arguments of these two would be cogent. I find it amazing that not more is being done to curtail the activities of the ever burgeoning U.S. population. So I ask, is it stupidity from blindness or just plain stupidity?

wayne w:

As i recall hearing just this week, ther are more Polar bears on this planet now that there was 20-30 years ago. And there is no such thing as Global warming...it has never been proved..just a concensus, & concensus isn't true Science! anyway how do we control the Sun??!!

Chris:

This should put the "polar bears drowning" thing to rest:

Full article: http://www.winonadailynews.com/articles/2007/02/16/opinion/letters/let1.txt

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)